🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, but block by block. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots added later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president last year went for Zohran this year. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. The independent kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. But no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.